Microsoft GitHub Tightens Rules On Security Research And Copyright Circumvention

From LinuxReviews
Jump to navigationJump to search
Censorship.jpg

Microsoft GitHub has published a announcement of new rules around security research, proof of concept exploits, "malware", "harmful content" and code that could be used to circumvent copyright restrictions. A wide range of general-purpose software could fall afoul of the updated censorship policy. The rules new rules will take effect on June 1st, 2021.

written by 林慧 (Wai Lin) 2021-05-01 - last edited 2021-05-01. © CC BY

Censorship-wide.jpg
Censorship. It's always a bad idea.

Microsoft GitHub has published drafts for two new sets of rules that will affect all GitHub users come June 1st, 2021.

One deals with DMCA complaints about software that could be used to circumvent Digital Restrictions Management measures that restrict fair use of works protected by copyright. The draft for the new DMCA enforcement policy, titled "DMCA policy updates #395", refers to US Copyright law section 1201. That law lays out how American corporations can unjustly restrict how American citizens can use copies of copyrighted works they bought and paid for. GitHub is a subsidiary of the American Microsoft corporation, which is why GitHub is imposing this law on the entire world.

GitHub has been censoring a wide range of emulation tools and software for quite some time. The "new" DMCA will therefore not have any larger practical implications, it merely puts the existing unwritten policy in writing.

The other new rule-set GitHub is about to impose will have some slightly more tangible effects. GitHub has published a "draft" with new rules around security research titled "Exploits and malware policy updates #397". It comes as partly as a response to widespread criticism following Microsoft GitHub's removal of a exploit for the Microsoft Exchange server software. Critics pointed out that similar exploit code for competing products had not been taken down in the past.

The changes to the new upcoming "Open Exploits and malware policy updates" begin with a kind of sneaky change to all "Content Restrictions" in their overall acceptable use policies:

"Under no circumstances will Users upload, post, host, execute, or transmit any Content to any repositories that:"

is changed to

"Under no circumstances will Users upload, post, host, execute, or transmit any Content that:"

It makes sense to make all the rules apply to all of GitHub from GitHub's perspective. Why that general policy chance is made as a "Exploits and malware policy" change is anyone's guess.

The next policy change is specific to security-related code.

"Under no circumstances will Users upload, post, host, execute, or transmit any Content to any repositories that contains or installs malware or exploits that are in support of ongoing and active attacks that are causing harm"

GitHub Open Exploits and malware policy updates #397

This is a interestingly worded rule because there is a whole lot of different code that could be used to install other code from outside of GitHub. Common and on their own perfectly innocent pieces of software like curl and wget would be in violation of this policy if they are deemed to be used to fetch exploit code as part of some ongoing attack. Hashcat, everything with a http client and variety of general software could fall afoul of this policy.

The "Active malware or exploits" has also been updated with somewhat broad text clarifying that GitHub can not be used to "in support" of active attacks that "cause harm".

"We do not allow anyone to use our platform in support of active attacks that cause harm, such as using GitHub as a means to deliver malicious executables, or as attack infrastructure, for example by organizing denial of service attacks or managing command and control servers."

GitHub Open Exploits and malware policy updates #397

The Microsoft subsidiary is also adding a section where they acknowledge that some "research into vulnerabilities, malware or exploits" could educational value. Any such content must, when the new rules take effect:

"Clearly identify and describe any potentially harmful content in a disclaimer in the project’s README.md file."

GitHub Open Exploits and malware policy updates #397

and

"Provide a designated security contact through a SECURITY.md file in the repository."

GitHub Open Exploits and malware policy updates #397

Following those new rules will not be any guarantee against censorship of any vaguely security-related source code:

"GitHub may restrict content if we determine that it still poses a risk where we receive active abuse reports and maintainers are working toward resolution."

Microsoft GitHub has published a blog post titled "A call for feedback on our policies around exploits and malware" where it ask for "feedback" on their policy updates. The new policy will take effect on June 1st.

GitHub is just a very convenient web front end for the git version control system. There are several free software web front ends you can download and install on your own server if you object to any of GitHub's new or existing terms, and that is the only meaningful form of "feedback" you can give them. GitHub is not merely proposing new rules in order to have a discussion, it is simply announcing a new policy that will take effect as-is come June 1st, 2021.

--- The Russians are concerned about this development.

0.00
(0 votes)


avatar

Anonymous (e4468cc0)

27 days ago
Score 0
NB: sourcehut is open source software living in a git repo hosted on sourcehut.
avatar

Anonymous (e4468cc0)

27 days ago
Score 0
actually many repos, and many are actually Free Software: https://git....search=sr.ht
avatar

Anonymous (cd8e711c)

26 days ago
Score 0

based russian said it best:

>Github has never been a site of freedom. They had full censorship, including ideological censorship, even before the acquisition by Microsoft (the same c-plus-equality and gamergate).

>Any DMCA there was also observed very strictly and excessively, removed and blocked only on the way. Exploits - the same if found. The current change in the rules only codifies the previously tacitly adopted rules of the github.

>It is surprising that many do not have memory and see in the past some kind of golden age of github with freedoms, friendship and kindness.

this is more of microsoft just putting the final nail in the coffin by furthering doubling down what github was already doing before microsoft. it sucks but what can you do? all these mainstream sites eventually go this way. corporate or not.
avatar

Anonymous (2dcc9bef)

24 days ago
Score 0

Before the MS takeover, I applied at GitHub as a developer support person... My job was going to be... inform devs about policy, including copyright and licensing.

After my test sample, I was told, they really liked my writing style but decided to not move forward because I informed users of actual law... over their policies.

Another thing to note, they had a huge issue with hosting of pr0n and needed to reduce this... I'm guessing so they could sell to M$...

Set up your own git server, that's what I did... or use another server. However, I question GitLab these days... and of course, in the past, they had a database issue and no backup... so, not so sure about the current status.
Add your comment
LinuxReviews welcomes all comments. If you do not want to be anonymous, register or log in. It is free.