Recent MA Sports Betting Bill Contains Substantial Tax Increase And Ban On In-Play Betting

From LinuxReviews
Jump to navigationJump to search


Massachusetts sports betting might look completely different if a brand-new expense proposed in the Senate achieves success. And if history is any indication, managed sports betting in other states could also alter considerably.
bet9ja.com

SD 1657 was presented by Sen. John Keenan. "An Act Addressing Economic, Health, and Social Harms Caused by Sports Betting" aims to increase the existing sports betting tax rate from 20% to 51%. Furthermore, Sen. Keenan calls for a complete restriction on live betting (in-game betting) and prop bets.
bet9ja.com

The main thing to bear in mind is that Massachusetts has been at the leading edge of more stringent sports betting guidelines. The second thing to understand is that the language of this expense resembles the SAFE Bet Act, a federal piece of legislation introduced in 2024.


This expense was introduced not long after former Massachusetts Governor and current NCAA president Charlie Baker affirmed in front of the Senate in a meeting on sports betting guideline.


So, while this is currently a Massachusetts costs, it's most likely to affect other states that provide managed sports betting.

A closer look at SD 1657
Taxation

Starting with the tax rate increase, bringing sports betting to 51% has actually been a target for Sen. Keenan before. Keenan proposed a tax increase at the last legal session, however it was rejected. This increase would have been available in the state's budget expense.


Just 3 markets have tax rates of 51%, the greatest in the nation: New York, Rhode Island, and New Hampshire. At 20%, Massachusetts currently ranks 6th highest.

Banning live betting and prop betting

The step forbids in-play (live betting) or prop betting. Just straight wagers would be permitted, restricting sportsbooks to using only moneyline, spread, and totals.


While Massachusetts and other markets have restrictions on college betting, this would impact even professional sporting events.


The bill likewise seeks to add benefits and same-game parlays to the classification of "unjust and deceptive practices." Sportsbooks favour same-game parlays due to their high "hold" percentage, the amount of money they keep off each $1 bet.

Gamer Limits

SD 1657 also aims to produce compulsory daily and month-to-month limitations for bettors. Bettors might not wager more than $1,000 a day and $10,000 a month without an 'cost assessment' which includes checking checking account. A player can not wager more than 15% of the amount in their account.
bit.ly

Massachusetts would become the very first market to need an affordability assessment on bettors.

Marketing restrictions

Keenan likewise wants to remove marketing throughout televised sporting events. The measure would restrict sportsbooks from running ads throughout video games. The Massachusetts Gaming Commission has checked out developing a ban on in-game advertisements before. Nevertheless, this did not go through as national TV offers make this hard to impose.

Will the step pass?

The measure is harsh in its modifications to the sports betting industry in Massachusetts. Banning prop betting and increasing the sports betting tax rate will likely result in pushback from local sportsbooks and market advocates.


Because of this, the measure will likely be combated in the Senate and your home of Representatives. In the previous session, Keenan stopped working to raise the tax rate.


He would have to persuade the other senators who did not support his initiative before to alter their minds. If and when the Senate discusses this measure, it is impossible to inform how it will be received.
bet9ja.com